From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purnell v. Singh

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jul 27, 2022
1:21-cv-00059 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00059

07-27-2022

ROBERT PURNELL, et al, Plaintiffs, v. HARZANMEET SINGH, et al, Defendants.


HOLMES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L.CAMPBELL, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was filed on July 5, 2022. (Doc. No. 33). Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to effect service of process. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Purnell v. Singh

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jul 27, 2022
1:21-cv-00059 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Purnell v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PURNELL, et al, Plaintiffs, v. HARZANMEET SINGH, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00059 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 27, 2022)