From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purcella v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 10, 1992
968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 92-1071, 92-1078 and 92-1107.

July 10, 1992.

Before LOGAN, MOORE, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, these appeals have been settled and are hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment of January 14, 1992, reported at 1992 WL 8723, 1992 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 426, and to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106-107, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 948 (10th Cir. 1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Purcella v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 10, 1992
968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

Purcella v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DEBBIE PURCELLA, DOING BUSINESS AS INTERMOUNTAIN COMPANIES; MONTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 1992

Citations

968 F.2d 10 (10th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

O'Bryant v. U.S.

S.Rep. No. 960, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 42 (1928). See also Purcella v. United States, 1992 WL 8723, 22-1…

U.S. v. National Steel Corp., (S.D.Ind. 1995)

In addition to collecting erroneous refunds using § 7405 and § 6532(b), the government may collect such sums…