From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purcell v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. CV 12-8456-DDP (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-8456-DDP (JPR)

03-24-2015

RANDY PURCELL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BITER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. On December 5, 2014, after receiving more than a year's worth of extensions of time, Petitioner filed objections to the R&R, in which he rests "fully" on the arguments in his Petition and Reply and briefly summarizes some of them.

Having made a de novo determination of the R&R, to which Petitioner fully objected, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied, and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: March 24, 2015

/s/_________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Purcell v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. CV 12-8456-DDP (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Purcell v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:RANDY PURCELL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 12-8456-DDP (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2015)