From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullins v. Hagins

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2016
184 So. 3d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5770.

02-18-2016

John F. PULLINS, Petitioner, v. Dean W. HAGINS, et al., Respondents.

John F. Pullins, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Albert J. Bowden, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Respondents.


John F. Pullins, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Albert J. Bowden, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Respondents.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pullins v. Hagins

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2016
184 So. 3d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Pullins v. Hagins

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. PULLINS, Petitioner, v. DEAN W. HAGINS, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 18, 2016

Citations

184 So. 3d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
2016 WL 661581