From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullin v. Davis

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Feb 22, 2018
Civil Action No. 11829-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11829-VCG

02-22-2018

RE: Pullin v. Davis


Richard Berl, Jr., Esquire
Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC
34382 Carpenter's Way, Suite 3
Lewes, DE 19958 Mr. and Mrs. Michael Davis
1297 N. Bend Road
Jarrettsville, MD 21084 Dear Litigants:

This Letter Order will memorialize my Bench ruling of January 24, 2018. For the reasons given from the Bench on the record of that date, the following is my Order:

1. An implied easement exists burdening the Davis property in favor of the Pullin property. The easement is for the use and maintenance of a septic line, tank and field for the benefit of a single-family house on the Pullin property, located on the Davis property. The easement includes reasonable access to maintain and repair the line, tank and field. The easement runs with the land.

2. Mr. Davis is liable for wrongfully blocking the septic line and interfering with the easement during the time when the record indicates the septic system was operating properly, in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS ($4,230.00).

3. I find by a preponderance of the evidence that the septic system currently is not functioning properly and, as a result, use of the septic system would exceed the scope of the easement. Therefore, Mr. Davis is not liable for the current blocking of the easement.

4. Because use of the septic system in its current condition would exceed the scope of the easement, the Plaintiff's request for an injunction barring Mr. Davis from interfering with the use of the system and directing him to unblock the system is DENIED.
5. Because the Plaintiff established the easement by implication by evidence which I found clear and convincing, the request for a declaratory judgment as to the easement is GRANTED.

6. This Order is final.

7. Nothing in this Order prevents the Pullins or their successors in title from demonstrating that the septic system has been restored to operating condition, and seeking injunctive relief against Mr. Davis or his successors in title to restore use, via a subsequent action.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor cc: Register in Chancery


Summaries of

Pullin v. Davis

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Feb 22, 2018
Civil Action No. 11829-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Pullin v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:RE: Pullin v. Davis

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Feb 22, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 11829-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Pullin

Subsequently, the Pullins have installed a new septic system entirely within their property, Lot 1, and have…