From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullen v. Allen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 71313 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)

Opinion

No. 71313

11-17-2016

MARGARET PULLEN, Petitioner, v. CHUCK ALLEN, Respondent.

cc: Margaret Pullen Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges petitioner's confinement pursuant to a judgment of conviction. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

Petitioner has not provided this court with a copy of her judgment of conviction and it is unclear whether she has been charged with or convicted of a criminal offense.

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Margaret Pullen

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Pullen v. Allen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 17, 2016
No. 71313 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Pullen v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET PULLEN, Petitioner, v. CHUCK ALLEN, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 17, 2016

Citations

No. 71313 (Nev. Nov. 17, 2016)