From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulido v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 10, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01942-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01942-RCJ-VCF

04-10-2013

JESSICA PULIDO, Plaintiff, v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC, a Tennessee Corporation; Does I-X and Roc Business Entities I-X Defendants.

JAMES P. KEMP, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff SUZANNE L. MARTIN, ESQUIRE Attorney for Defendant


JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6375
KEMP & KEMP
7435 W. Azure Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Ph. (702) 258-1183 / Fax (702) 258-6983
jp@kemp-attorneys.com
Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff JESSICA PULIDO and Defendant REGAL CINEMAS, INC, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs. ______________________
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQUIRE
Attorney for Plaintiff
______________________
SUZANNE L. MARTIN, ESQUIRE
Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE this 10th day of April, 2013.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: ______________________
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQUIRE
Nevada Bar No. 006375
KEMP & KEMP
7435 W. Azure Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89130
(702)2584183
Attorney for Plaintiff


Summaries of

Pulido v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 10, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01942-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Pulido v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JESSICA PULIDO, Plaintiff, v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC, a Tennessee Corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01942-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)