From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulera v. STC Broadcasting, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 28, 2005
474 Mich. 927 (Mich. 2005)

Opinion

No. 128599.

November 28, 2005.


Summary Disposition.

SC: 128599, COA: 250409.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the July 24, 2003, opinion and order of the Genesee Circuit Court. Plaintiff admitted in paragraph 10 of his complaint: "Per the terms of the employment contract, plaintiff was to work for Defendant Corporation from April 13, 1998 to December 31, 2000." This admission establishes that the parties' employment contract had a beginning date of April 13, 1998, and an ending date of December 31, 2000. It is undisputed that plaintiff worked for the duration of this period and that defendant paid plaintiff for his work during this period. Defendant therefore had no obligation under the employment contract to pay plaintiff a severance. New Amsterdam Cas Co v. Sokolowski, 374 Mich 340, 342 (1965) ("If the language of the contract is clear and unambiguous, it is to be construed according to its plain sense and meaning. . . ."). We do not retain jurisdiction.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ. We would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Pulera v. STC Broadcasting, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 28, 2005
474 Mich. 927 (Mich. 2005)
Case details for

Pulera v. STC Broadcasting, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD PULERA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STC BROADCASTING, INC., d/b/a…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 28, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 927 (Mich. 2005)
706 N.W.2d 12