From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PUIN v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 10, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV544 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV544.

April 10, 2007


ORDER


The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. Therefore, it is not necessary that the action remain on the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that this action is closed. It shall be marked settled and dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to (1) vacate this Order and reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary or (2) alter the terms of settlement and dismissal upon agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

PUIN v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 10, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV544 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2007)
Case details for

PUIN v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY J. PUIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., ET…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 10, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV544 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2007)