From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puderbaugh v. Woodland Park Hospital

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 14, 1986
719 P.2d 65 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

84-07461; CA A36790

Argued and submitted March 12, 1986.

Affirmed May 14, 1986.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

William H. Schultz, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland.

Yvonne P. Meekcoms, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Bruce L. Byerly and Moscato Byerly, Portland.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


The issue in this workers' compensation case is whether claimant's injury is compensable. He injured himself while playing softball on a team sponsored by his employer. The referee concluded that the injury was compensable; the Board reversed. Applying the analysis we used in Rose v. Argonaut Ins. Co., 77 Or. App. 167, 711 P.2d 218 (1985), and Richmond v. SAIF, 58 Or. App. 354, 648 P.2d 370, rev den 293 Or. 634 (1982), to the facts here, we conclude, on de novo review, that his injury did not arise "out of and in the course of employment." ORS 656.005(8)(a). It is therefore not compensable.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Puderbaugh v. Woodland Park Hospital

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 14, 1986
719 P.2d 65 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Puderbaugh v. Woodland Park Hospital

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Timothy R. Puderbaugh, Claimant…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1986

Citations

719 P.2d 65 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
719 P.2d 65

Citing Cases

Town Country Chrysler v. Mitchell

Obviously, it expected that its employees would participate in the picnic activities, including the softball…