From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puckett v. R. Zamora

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2015
1:12-cv-00948 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2015)

Opinion

          William L. Schmidt, Aaron J. Aguirre, WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C., Fresno, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett.

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, Timothy H. Delgado, Deputy Attorney General, Attorney for Defendants Acevedo, Gutierrez, and Rodriguez

          BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP, Susan E. Coleman, Attorney for Defendant Zamora.


          JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL ORDER (DOC. 63) (Doc. 86)

          JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

         RECITALS

         WHEREAS, on June 17, 2015, Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for defendants Acevedo, Gutierrez, and Rodriguez met and conferred regarding modification of the Court's Pretrial Order of May 15, 2015. Counsel for Plaintiff has identified a number of additional exhibits to be used at trial.

Counsel for defendant Zamora was not invited to participate in this process, but was informed of plaintiff's proposed additions on June 17, 2015.

         WHEREAS these parties have agreed to permit Plaintiff to use, if needed, the following Defense exhibits in the prosecution of Plaintiff's case in chief:

         (1) the Rules Violation Report (CDC 115), Log No. 3A03-12-01-005,

         (2) all documents contained in the related CRIME/INCIDENT Report (CDC 837), Incident Log No. COR 03A-12-01-0018,

         (3) Medical Report of Injury or Unusual Occurrence (CDC 7219), dated January 10, 2012

         (4) Inmate/Parolee Appeal (CDC 602), Log No. COR-12-202,

         WHEREAS in addition to the documents listed in the Court's Pretrial Order (Doc. 63) dated May 15, 2015, Plaintiff anticipates admitting the following exhibits:

         (5) the declaration of C. Acevedo dated June 16, 2014,

         (6) the declaration of R. Gutierrez dated June 19, 2014,

         (7) the declaration of P. Rodriguez dated June 20, 2014, and

         (8) the declaration of R. Zamora dated June 20, 2014.

         Counsel for defendant Zamora objects to any of these declarations being admitted, as they are hearsay, the declarants are not unavailable, and it would be confusing to the jury.

         WHEREAS the Court's Pretrial Order has not been previously modified.

         Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, that the Court's Pretrial Order (Doc. 63) be modified as follows: in addition to the documents listed in the Court's Pretrial Order (Doc. 63) dated May 15, 2015, Plaintiff anticipates seeking to admit the following exhibits:

(1) Rules Violation Report (CDC 115), Log No. 3A03-12-01-005,

(2) all documents contained in the related CRIME/INCIDENT Report (CDC 837), Incident Log No. COR 03A-12-01-0018,

(3) Medical Report of Injury or Unusual Occurrence (CDC 7219), dated January 10, 2012,

(4) Inmate/Parolee Appeal (CDC 602), Log No. COR-12-202,

(6) the declaration of R. Gutierrez dated June 19, 2014,

(7) the declaration of P. Rodriguez dated June 20, 2014, and

(8) the declaration of R. Zamora dated June 20, 2014.

          ORDER

         The stipulation of counsel to modify the pretrial order (Doc. 86), is GRANTED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Puckett v. R. Zamora

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2015
1:12-cv-00948 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Puckett v. R. Zamora

Case Details

Full title:DURRELL A. PUCKETT, Plaintiff, v. R. ZAMORA, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 19, 2015

Citations

1:12-cv-00948 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2015)