From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Public Service Mutual Ins. v. Camp Raleigh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1996
233 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 26, 1996.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered May 6, 1996, which declared that plaintiff Public Service Mutual Insurance Company has no duty to defend and indemnify defendant Camp Raleigh, Inc., under multi-peril or catastrophe umbrella insurance policies, with respect to an underlying personal injury action against defendants David Cooper and Avi Cooper, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


The motion court properly concluded that the sexual molestation allegations in the underlying action do not constitute an accidental "occurrence" under the subject insurance policies issued to defendant Camp Raleigh, Inc. As noted in Board of Educ. v Continental Ins. Co. ( 198 AD2d 816, 817), "[t]here is nothing accidental about the charges contained in the [underlying] complaint * * * [S]exual abuse * * * is intentional in nature." Here, the inclusion of causes of action sounding in negligent training and supervision does not alter the fact that "the operative act[s] giving rise to any recovery [are] the [intentional sexual] assault[s]. While the insured's negligence may have been a proximate cause of plaintiff[s'] injuries, that only resolves its liability; it does not resolve the insured's right to coverage based on the language of the contract between him and the insurer." ( Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v Creative Hous., 88 NY2d 347, 352.)


Summaries of

Public Service Mutual Ins. v. Camp Raleigh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1996
233 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Public Service Mutual Ins. v. Camp Raleigh

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. CAMP RALEIGH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 136

Citing Cases

Sweet Home Cent. S. Dist. v. Aetna Com. Ins. Co.

Contrary to the view expressed by the dissent, it is the nature of the underlying acts, not the theory of…

Shared-Interest Man. v. Travlers Prop

In its breach of contract claims Knox seeks to recover damages for economic loss, but no such recovery can be…