From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Psaty v. Fifth Avenue and Ninety-Third Street

Supreme Court, New York County
Jun 6, 1928
132 Misc. 279 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)

Opinion

June 6, 1928.

Samuel Hellinger [ E. Lloyd Meyer of counsel], for the plaintiff.

Gallert, Hilborn Raphael, for the defendants.


For the reasons indicated on the companion motion, decided herewith, this motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants on the ground that the Statute of Limitations bars plaintiff's right to recover, must be denied. Order signed.


Summaries of

Psaty v. Fifth Avenue and Ninety-Third Street

Supreme Court, New York County
Jun 6, 1928
132 Misc. 279 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)
Case details for

Psaty v. Fifth Avenue and Ninety-Third Street

Case Details

Full title:MAX PSATY, Plaintiff, v. FIFTH AVENUE AND NINETY-THIRD STREET CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Jun 6, 1928

Citations

132 Misc. 279 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)
229 N.Y.S. 476

Citing Cases

Shuop v. Trust Co.

But it is casual when not permanent nor periodically regular, but occasional or by chance, and not in the…