From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryor v. Hurley

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 14, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-936 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:05-CV-936.

August 14, 2006


ORDER


On July 7, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Steckman, Doc. No. 15, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against Steckman, Doc. No. 25, both be DENIED. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Steckman, Doc. No. 15, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against Steckman, Doc. No. 25, are hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

Pryor v. Hurley

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 14, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-936 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Pryor v. Hurley

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PRYOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PAT HURLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action 2:05-CV-936 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2006)