From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 2006
932 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D06-416.

July 3, 2006.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Diego Puig and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


As the state correctly concedes, petitioner's motion for reduction or modification of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) was timely filed. Accordingly, contrary to its order, the trial court did possess jurisdiction to consider the merits of that motion. The state also correctly concedes that the trial court's order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law, entitling petitioner to the writ of certiorari he seeks. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The petition seeking a writ of certiorari is granted; the trial court's order denying petitioner's rule 3.800(c) motion for lack of jurisdiction is quashed; and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI GRANTED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Pruitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 2006
932 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Pruitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Travarus Q. PRUITT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 3, 2006

Citations

932 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Martin v. State

The State also correctly concedes that the trial court's order constitutes a departure from the essential…

Del Valle v. State

An order denying a rule 3.800(c) motion based on lack of jurisdiction is reviewable by certiorari. Staveley…