From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. Cook

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 24, 2013
986 N.E.2d 28 (Ohio 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2013-0341

2013-04-24

Pruitt v. Cook



MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS


In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Kenneth Pruitt. Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela, 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903 (1998); Hernandez v. Kelly, 107 Ohio St.3d 1430, 2005-Ohio-6400, 838 N.E.2d 670.

It is further ordered that respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within 10 days after the return is filed. Petitioner's physical presence before the court is not required.

O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ.


Summaries of

Pruitt v. Cook

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 24, 2013
986 N.E.2d 28 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

Pruitt v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:Pruitt v. Cook

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

986 N.E.2d 28 (Ohio 2013)
135 Ohio St. 3d 1411