From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruett v. Stolz

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 31, 2013
No. 05-13-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-13-00378-CV

07-31-2013

TODD PRUETT, Appellant v. MARK STOLZ, ET AL., Appellees


On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07463


ORDER

Before the Court is appellant's July 24, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant explains that he needs an extension of time to file a brief because he is trying to obtain a reporter's record from the 265th Judicial District Court in Dallas County, Texas. By order signed on May 24, 2013, this Court denied appellant's motion for the reporter's record from the 265th Judicial District Court, because no record from the proceedings in the 265th Judicial District Court was made part of the record in the proceedings on appeal in this case.

For this reason, we DENY appellant's motion.

On the Court's own motion, we ORDER appellant to file his brief on or before August 23, 2013. We caution appellant that failure to file a brief by that date will result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1)

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Pruett v. Stolz

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 31, 2013
No. 05-13-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Pruett v. Stolz

Case Details

Full title:TODD PRUETT, Appellant v. MARK STOLZ, ET AL., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

No. 05-13-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2013)