From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruett v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
May 13, 2019
Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00110-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00110-O-BP

05-13-2019

SHANIA NELLIE PRUETT, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 15. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return this case using the standard process.

SO ORDERED on this 13th day of May, 2019.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pruett v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
May 13, 2019
Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00110-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Pruett v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:SHANIA NELLIE PRUETT, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00110-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 13, 2019)

Citing Cases

Salas v. Saul

The Court uses the revised Listing as that version was in effect at the time the ALJ made his decision. See…

Lindsey v. Saul

The Court uses the Listing in effect at the time the ALJ made his decision. See Pruett v. Berryhill, 2019 WL…