From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prudhomme v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
May 7, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1344 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1344

05-07-2018

LASQUES (VACQUES) PRUDHOMME v. SHERIFF JAY RUSSELL IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against the Ouachita Parish Policy Jury only are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff wishes to amend his Complaint to state a claim against Ouachita Parish Police Jury, he must file the appropriate motion, based on additional facts, and attach the proposed amended complaint.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 7th day of May, 2018.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Prudhomme v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
May 7, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1344 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Prudhomme v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:LASQUES (VACQUES) PRUDHOMME v. SHERIFF JAY RUSSELL IN HIS OFFICIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: May 7, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1344 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2018)