Opinion
Submitted May 17, 2000.
July 26, 2000.
In a subrogation action to recover insurance benefits paid to the plaintiff's insured, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated August 30, 1999, which denied its motion to vacate the automatic dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and to restore the action to the trial calendar.
Gallacher, Kushel Horvat, Riverhead, N.Y. (Robert F. Horvat of counsel), for respondent.
Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In order to restore a case to the trial calendar after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiff must establish: (1) the merits of the case, (2) a reasonable excuse for the delay, (3) the absence of an intent to abandon the matter, and (4) the lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party if the case is restored to the calendar (see, Rudy v. Chasky, 260 A.D.2d 625; Iazzetta v. Vicenzi, 243 A.D.2d 540). All four components must be satisfied before the dismissal can be vacated (see, Rudy v. Chasky, supra; Iazzetta v. Vicenzi, supra).
The plaintiff failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment and failed to offer a reasonable excuse for failing to appear on the calendar date (see, Lupoli v. Venus Labs., 264 A.D.2d 820). Accordingly, the court properly denied the plaintiff's motion (see, Rudy v. Chasky, supra).