From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proxima Beta Pvt Ltd v. Martin

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 9, 2022
2:21-cv-2056 MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2056 MWF (JEMx)

06-09-2022

PROXIMA BETA PTE. LIMITED, a Singapore Corporation, and KRAFTON, INC., a Korea Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ANDREW MARTIN a/k/a Asyhole; ANDRE SWIRSZCZUK a/k/a Girabaldi; KULDIP PATEL; JESSE ZHANG; and DOES 1 through 6, inclusive, Defendants.


JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge

Having considered the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment by Plaintiffs Proxima Beta PTE. Limited (“Proxima”) and Krafton, Inc. (together, “Plaintiffs”) against defendant Andrew Martin (“Defendant”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

1. Defendant, and all persons acting under his direction or control (including but not limited to his agents, subsidiaries, representatives and employees), are immediately and permanently enjoined from any and all of the following activities:

(a) taking any steps on Defendant's own behalf or assisting others in distributing, advertising, marketing, selling, reselling, uploading, downloading, offering for sale, or otherwise disseminating in the United States any software whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plainitffs' games in the United States, or violates Proxima's End User License Agreement and Terms of Use (collectively, “TOU”) with its U.S. customers, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at the mobile version of “Player Unknown's Battlegrounds” (“PUBGM”) and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(b) obtaining, possessing, accessing or using in the United States any software whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plaintiffs' games, or violates the TOU, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at PUBGM and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(c) assisting in any way with the creation or development in the United States of any software whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plaintiffs' games, or violates the TOU, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at PUBGM
and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(d) publishing or distributing in the United States any source code or instructional material for the creation of any software whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plaintiffs' games, or violates the TOU, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at PUBGM and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(e) selling, transferring, or assigning to any person or entity the intellectual property in any product or service (including the rights in any source code) whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plaintiffs' games, or violates the TOU, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at PUBGM and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(f) operating, assisting or linking to any website located in the United States or accessible to United States residents that is designed to provide information to assist others in accessing, developing or obtaining any software whose use circumvents technological measures that control access to Plaintiffs' games, or violates the TOS, including but not limited to Sharpshooter, GMSPack, or CheatNinja cheating software aimed at PUBGM and any other software product or service designed to exploit or enable the exploitation of any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs;
(g) investing or holding any financial interest in any enterprise which Defendant knows or has reason to know is now, or intends in the future to be, engaged in any activities in the United States that are prohibited by this Judgment and Permanent Injunction.
(h) reverse engineering, decompiling, packet editing, or otherwise manipulating without authorization in the United States, any game owned, published, or operated by Plaintiffs or their subsidiaries or providing assistance to any person or entity engaged in such activities.

2. Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs against Defendant in the sum of $1,000,000.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Proxima Beta Pvt Ltd v. Martin

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 9, 2022
2:21-cv-2056 MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Proxima Beta Pvt Ltd v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:PROXIMA BETA PTE. LIMITED, a Singapore Corporation, and KRAFTON, INC., a…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-2056 MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2022)