From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Provencher v. Town of Saranac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County (Plumadore, J.).


Plaintiffs are the owners of certain premises situate in the Town of Saranac, Clinton County, which border on a dirt road approximately 500 feet in length known as Parsonage Road or Gonang Drive. This road, running generally east and west, connects Upper Saranac Road to State Route 3 and serves as a driveway for plaintiffs and the parsonage of the First Methodist Episcopal Church, the only other dwelling along the road. In early 1989, plaintiffs asserted private ownership of the road and placed a log barrier across the road, posted signs and chained a guard dog nearby to prevent public use of the road and access to the church parsonage therefrom. Defendant responded, contending that it was a town highway, and threatened legal action against plaintiffs if they failed to remove the obstructions and persisted in their claim of title. Plaintiffs commenced this action which resulted in a determination by Supreme Court that the roadway at issue is a public road.

We affirm. There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding of Supreme Court. Testimony of the Town Supervisor, the Town Superintendent of Highways and a former longtime employee of the Town Highway Department established that, for a period of over 10 years, defendant plowed and sanded the road in question during the winter months and performed other work necessary to maintain, care for and improve the road, such as widening, grading and adding Stabmat, a form of gravel, to the surface of the road. Additionally, there was testimony that the road was used by the general public. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Highway Law § 189, Parsonage Road/Gonang Drive is a public road (see, Stuart v. Town of Wells, 161 A.D.2d 1073; Matter of Jemzura v. Mussision, 161 A.D.2d 851; see also, Matter of Hillelson v. Grover, 105 A.D.2d 484).

Order affirmed, without costs. Kane J.P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Provencher v. Town of Saranac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Provencher v. Town of Saranac

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW L. PROVENCHER et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF SARANAC, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 219

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Plaintiff disputes this ruling and argues that the fact that he drove through the crossing at least 36 times…

Town of Addison v. Meeks

The Town's witnesses described a daily steady stream of traffic, including vehicles and pedestrians ( see,…