From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prout v. Varner

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 29, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4202 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2008)

Summary

considering request for equitable tolling of the AEDPA statute of limitations under Rule 60(b)

Summary of this case from Fraticelli v. Piazza

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4202.

February 29, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2008, upon consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, it is hereby

ORDERED

that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner's Motion for Equitable Relief in the Exercise of this Court's Inherent Article III Powers and/or for Relief from Judgment (Doc. No. 1.) is DENIED; and

3. A certificate of appealability is not granted.


Summaries of

Prout v. Varner

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 29, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4202 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2008)

considering request for equitable tolling of the AEDPA statute of limitations under Rule 60(b)

Summary of this case from Fraticelli v. Piazza
Case details for

Prout v. Varner

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PROUT v. BENJAMIN VARNER, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4202 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Fraticelli v. Piazza

Such a motion is "properly construed . . . as arising under Rule 60(b)(6)." Turner v. Dragovich, 163 Fed.…