From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 12, 1969
228 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-327.

December 12, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, William A. Patterson, J.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and William F. Casler, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


The trial judge recognized the requirement of Lampley v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 515, that there be evidence of scienter in a prosecution for uttering a forged instrument, but entered judgment of conviction after verdict because that case had not been followed in the Second District. We approve the language of Judge Charles Carroll's opinion in that case and accordingly reverse and remand with directions to discharge the defendant.

HOBSON, C.J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 12, 1969
228 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Prough v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL O. PROUGH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 12, 1969

Citations

228 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)