From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Propulsion Controls Co. v. Burge

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 24, 2017
508 S.W.3d 188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

WD 79368

01-24-2017

PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Attorneys: Casey P. Murray, Kansas City, MO for appellant, Bart A. Matanic for respondent State of Missouri; Redina Burge, acting pro se


Attorneys: Casey P. Murray, Kansas City, MO for appellant, Bart A. Matanic for respondent State of Missouri; Redina Burge, acting pro se

Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Redina Burge applied for unemployment benefits after her employment with Propulsion Control Company, LLC was terminated in July 2015. Propulsion protested the claim on the basis that Burge had been discharged for misconduct. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Burge's termination was not for misconduct connected with work, and that she was therefore eligible for unemployment benefits. Propulsion appeals, arguing that the Commission's decision is not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Propulsion Controls Co. v. Burge

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 24, 2017
508 S.W.3d 188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Propulsion Controls Co. v. Burge

Case Details

Full title:PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 24, 2017

Citations

508 S.W.3d 188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)