From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.112

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 26, 2000
461 Mich. 1290 (Mich. 2000)

Opinion

April 26, 2000.


Orders Entered April 26, 2000:

On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering an amendment of Rule 6.112 of the Michigan Court Rules. Before determining whether the proposal should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford any interested person the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposal. We welcome the views of all who wish to address the proposal or who wish to suggest alternatives. Before adoption or rejection, this proposal will be considered at a public hearing by the Court. The Clerk of the Court will publish a schedule of future public hearings.

As whenever this Court publishes an administrative proposal for comment, we emphasize that publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption of the proposal in its present form.

[The present language would be amended as indicated below.]

Rule 6.112 The Information or Indictment

(A) — (B) [Unchanged.]

(C) Time of Filing Information or Indictment . The prosecutor must file the information on or before the date set for the arraignment. A supplemental information charging the defendant with being an habitual offender may not be filed more than 14 days after the defendant is arraigned or has waived arraignment on the information charging the underlying felony, or after trial has begun if the defendant is tried within the 14-day period. (D) — (E) [Unchanged.]

(F) Notice of Intent to Seek Enhanced Sentence. A notice of intent to seek an enhanced sentence pursuant to MCL 769.13; MSA 28.1085 must list the prior convictions that may be relied upon for purposes of sentence enhancement. The notice must be filed within 21 days after the defendant is arraigned or has waived arraignment on the information charging the underlying felony, or before trial begins, if the defendant is tried within the 21-day period. ( F G ) Harmless Error. Absent a timely objection and a showing of prejudice, a court may not dismiss an information or reverse a conviction because of an untimely filing (except of an habitual offender information) or because of an incorrectly cited statute or a variance between the information and proof regarding time, place, the manner in which the offense was committed, or other factual detail relating to the alleged offense. This provision does not apply to the untimely filing of a notice of intent to seek an enhanced sentence. ( G H ) [Relettered, but otherwise unchanged.]

Staff Comment: The changes in MCR 6.112 would make the court rule consistent with MCL 769.13; MSA 28.1085, and are based on a proposal from the Michigan Judges Association.

The staff comment is published only for the benefit of the bench and bar and is not an authoritative construction by the Court.

Publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption in its present form. Timely comments will be substantively considered, and your assistance is appreciated by the Court.

A copy of this order will be given to the secretary of the State Bar and to the State Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201. Comments on this proposal may be sent to the Supreme Court clerk by August 1, 2000 . When filing a comment, please refer to our file No. 99-05.


Summaries of

Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.112

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 26, 2000
461 Mich. 1290 (Mich. 2000)
Case details for

Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.112

Case Details

Full title:Proposed Amendment of MCR 6.112

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 26, 2000

Citations

461 Mich. 1290 (Mich. 2000)