From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pronin v. Wright

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 15, 2019
No. 19-6780 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6780

11-15-2019

DMITRY PRONIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES WRIGHT, "Chuck"; NEAL URCH; L. BLACKWELL, Defendants - Appellees, and ASHLEY MCCANN, Defendant.

Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-03635-HM) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dmitry Pronin appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pronin v. Wright, No. 5:16-cv-03635-HMH (D.S.C. May 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Pronin v. Wright

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 15, 2019
No. 19-6780 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Pronin v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:DMITRY PRONIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES WRIGHT, "Chuck"; NEAL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 15, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6780 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2019)