From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prokhorova v. Kasimis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2013
104 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-21

Svetlana PROKHOROVA, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Angeliki KASIMIS, et al., Defendants, The City of New York, Defendant–Respondent.

Law Office of Jeffrey S. Schwartz, LLC, Mineola (Jeffrey S. Schwartz of counsel), for appellants. *648Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of Jeffrey S. Schwartz, LLC, Mineola (Jeffrey S. Schwartz of counsel), for appellants. *648Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which, inter alia, granted defendant the City's motion to deem it in compliance with a prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having certified that discovery was complete, plaintiffs are barred from challenging the motion court's determination that the City fully complied with the March 24, 2011 order by producing two knowledgeable witnesses ( see Bookazine Co. v. J & A Bindery, 61 A.D.2d 919, 919, 403 N.Y.S.2d 221 [1st Dept. 1978] ).

TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prokhorova v. Kasimis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2013
104 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Prokhorova v. Kasimis

Case Details

Full title:Svetlana PROKHOROVA, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Angeliki KASIMIS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1913
960 N.Y.S.2d 647