From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Carlberg Design, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 26, 2005
05 Civ. 5888 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2005)

Opinion

05 Civ. 5888 (JGK).

September 26, 2005


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This is a motion by the defendants to stay prosecution of this action in favor of an action previously filed by Carlberg Design, Inc. (one of the defendants in this action) against PRL USA Holdings, Inc. (the plaintiff in this action) in the Central District of Illinois. See Carlberg Design, Inc. v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc., Civ. Action No. 05-3151 (C.D. Ill.).

The defendants argue that the first-filed action in the Central District of Illinois should proceed and that this action should therefore be stayed. The plaintiff responds that the Central District of Illinois, the Court with jurisdiction over the first-filed suit, should decide which suit should proceed, and this motion is therefore superfluous. In the Illinois action, PRL USA has filed a motion to dismiss the first-filed Illinois action, and Carlberg has filed a cross-motion to enjoin this action.

All parties agree that the Court with jurisdiction over the first-filed action should decide which action should proceed. See, e.g., MSK Ins., Ltd. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 212 F.Supp.2d 266, 267 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) ("This District has laid down a bright-line rule for situations such as this: The court before which the first-filed action was brought determines which forum will hear the case.") Therefore, this Court defers to the Central District of Illinois for a determination of which action should proceed. Until that Court has reached its decision, this Court will stay this action in order to avoid duplication of efforts and to assure that there is no interference with the decision of the Central District of Illinois. The Court expresses no view as to how the issues before the Central District of Illinois should be decided.

For the reasons explained above, this action is stayed pending further order. The parties should advise the Court when there has been a decision by the Central District of Illinois.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Carlberg Design, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 26, 2005
05 Civ. 5888 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2005)
Case details for

PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Carlberg Design, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CARLBERG DESIGN, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 26, 2005

Citations

05 Civ. 5888 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2005)