From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pritchett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 18, 2000
9 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 76309.

January 18, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HONORABLE JOAN M. BURGER, JUDGE.

Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Barbara K. Chesser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.


ORDER


Movant Horashio Pritchett appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pritchett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 18, 2000
9 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Pritchett v. State

Case Details

Full title:HORASHIO PRITCHETT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

9 S.W.3d 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)