From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pritchard v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 8, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-1242 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-1242 (WMW/BRT)

10-08-2019

Mark Pritchard, Petitioner, v. Warden R. Marques, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the August 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Dkt. 10.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The August 19, 2019, R&R (Dkt. 10), is ADOPTED.

2. Petitioner Mark Pritchard's petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 8, 2019

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pritchard v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 8, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-1242 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Pritchard v. Marques

Case Details

Full title:Mark Pritchard, Petitioner, v. Warden R. Marques, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Oct 8, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-1242 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2019)