From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prinzing v. Guck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-16

In the Matter of Malinda A. PRINZING, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Paul G. GUCK and Doris M. Guck, Respondents–Respondents. In the Matter of Jason R. Guck, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Carl E. Prinzing and Malinda A. Prinzing, Respondents–Appellants. In the Matter of Paul G. Guck, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Carl E. Prinzing and Malinda A. Prinzing, Respondents–Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wayne County (Daniel G. Barrett, J.), entered September 19, 2011. The order, among other things, granted Paul G. Guck, Doris M. Guck and Jason R. Guck visitation with the subject children. Tyson Blue, Macedon, for Petitioner–Appellant and Respondents–Appellants. Elizabeth A. Sammons, Attorney for the Children, Williamson, for David P. and Alyssa P.


Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wayne County (Daniel G. Barrett, J.), entered September 19, 2011. The order, among other things, granted Paul G. Guck, Doris M. Guck and Jason R. Guck visitation with the subject children.
Tyson Blue, Macedon, for Petitioner–Appellant and Respondents–Appellants. Elizabeth A. Sammons, Attorney for the Children, Williamson, for David P. and Alyssa P.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Guck v. Prinzing (––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.2d –––– [Nov. 16, 2012] ).

*916It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prinzing v. Guck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Prinzing v. Guck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Malinda A. PRINZING, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Paul G…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7795
953 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Perri v. Case

Thus, the motion for "leave to reargue and/or renew" was actually one for leave to reargue only, and no…

Orleans Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Dana C. (In re Raymond H.)

Memorandum: In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent mother appeals from an order…