From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. Wheeler

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 1, 2021
19-cv-07432-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

19-cv-07432-WHO

10-01-2021

EVERETT PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW WHEELER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT RE: DKT. NO. 86

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received notice that the parties have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pringle v. Wheeler

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 1, 2021
19-cv-07432-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Pringle v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:EVERETT PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW WHEELER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

19-cv-07432-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2021)

Citing Cases

Handloser v. HCL America, Inc.

In evaluating whether a mental condition is in controversy, courts in the Ninth Circuit typically consider…

Angelo v. Thomson Int'l

Plaintiffs are generally correct that “courts have found ‘humiliation, mental anguish, and emotional…