From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 12, 2013
No. 62503 (Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 62503

04-12-2013

TROY LEE PRINGLE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of four counts of possession of a controlled substance. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Robert W. Lane, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to voluntarily withdraw this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, and having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

_______________, J.

Hardesty
_______________, J.
Parraguirre
_______________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge

Christopher R. Arabia

Nye County District Attorney

Attorney General/Carson City

Nye County Clerk

Troy Lee Pringle


Summaries of

Pringle v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 12, 2013
No. 62503 (Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Pringle v. State

Case Details

Full title:TROY LEE PRINGLE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

No. 62503 (Nev. Apr. 12, 2013)