From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. Brann

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 5, 2021
20-CV-9425 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-9425 (CM)

01-05-2021

JOSIAH PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER CYNTHIA BRANN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

COLLEEN MCMAHON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated November 18, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) and prisoner authorization or pay the $400.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application and prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

On December 1, 2020, the filing fees required to file a federal civil action increased to $402.00 - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee. Because Plaintiff's action was filed prior to December 1, 2020, the increased filing fees do not apply to this action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pringle v. Brann

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 5, 2021
20-CV-9425 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Pringle v. Brann

Case Details

Full title:JOSIAH PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER CYNTHIA BRANN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 5, 2021

Citations

20-CV-9425 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)