From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prine v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 8, 2010
Civil No. 08-6274-TC (D. Or. Jan. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-6274-TC.

January 8, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 15, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principlesde novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed and the clerk of court will enter final judgment.


Summaries of

Prine v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 8, 2010
Civil No. 08-6274-TC (D. Or. Jan. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Prine v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STACY LYNN PRINE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 8, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 08-6274-TC (D. Or. Jan. 8, 2010)