From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Primyah Godial Miaa Paynes El Bey v. Crocillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 21, 2020
20-CV-0524 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-0524 (LLS)

10-21-2020

PRIMYAH GODIAL MIAA PAYNES EL BEY, Plaintiff, v. CROCILLO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

Plaintiff filed this action pro se. When she initiated the action, she did not pay the filing fees or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Thus, on February 11, 2020, the Court directed her to pay the filing fees, or submit an IFP application. (See ECF No. 4.) Because Plaintiff failed to comply with that order, on April 22, 2020, the Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. (See ECF No. 5.)

On August 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration asking the Court to reopen the case because she had filed an IFP application. (See ECF Nos. 7-9.) The Court grants Plaintiff's motion. By separate order, the Court will address the IFP application.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 10) is granted. The Court vacates its April 22. 2020 order of dismissal and civil judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this matter. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. (ECF No. 3.) SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Louis L. Stanton

U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Primyah Godial Miaa Paynes El Bey v. Crocillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 21, 2020
20-CV-0524 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Primyah Godial Miaa Paynes El Bey v. Crocillo

Case Details

Full title:PRIMYAH GODIAL MIAA PAYNES EL BEY, Plaintiff, v. CROCILLO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 21, 2020

Citations

20-CV-0524 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2020)