From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Primus v. Stirling

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2014
583 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-7163

09-26-2014

JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON, ODC, Defendants - Appellees, and MR. WILLIAM BYARS, Defendant.

James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (4:13-cv-00768-JFA) Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Anthony Primus appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Primus' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Primus v. Stirling, No. 4:13-cv-00768-JFA (D.S.C. July 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Primus v. Stirling

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2014
583 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Primus v. Stirling

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING, SCDC…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 26, 2014

Citations

583 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Kinard v. McCall

Therefore, the second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim against Defendants for violation of a federal…