From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prime Healthcare Services-Shasta, LLC v. Burwell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 15, 2015
2:15-CV-00473-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2015)

Opinion

          STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING [L.R. 144(a)]

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC, and Defendant Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to extend the deadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint from May 29, 2015, to June 5, 2015, in light of the following:

         Plaintiff has filed a total of 8 cases challenging determinations by the Medicare Appeals Council that Plaintiff lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 29 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009.

         These cases are as follows:

         (1) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated September 30, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 29 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading was March 13, 2013, but the parties filed a stipulation to extend that deadline to April 10, 2013.

         (2) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-DAD, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated November 21, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 17 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading was March 30, 2013, but the parties filed a stipulation to extend that deadline to April 10, 2013.

         (3) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00324-JAM-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 10, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 6 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 4, 2015.

         (4) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00400-TLN-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 23, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 10 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 4, 2015.

         (5) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00450-KJM-CKD, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 29, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 18 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

         (6) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00473-MCE-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated January 2, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 19 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

         (7) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00474-MCE-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated January 2, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 7 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

         (8) In Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00709-TLN-KJN, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 29, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 25 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is June 2, 2015.

         The 8 cases are related because they involve the same parties and present the same legal issue - whether Medicare Appeals Council correctly determined that plaintiff lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to various beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The parties believe that, in the interest of economy and efficiency, it makes sense to have a single responsive pleading deadline for all eight cases and, accordingly, respectfully ask the Court to extend the deadline for the Defendant's responsive pleading to June 5, 2015.

          ORDER

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, EDWARD A. OLSEN, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants.

          YEKATERINA DEKADOKH, Attorney for Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta LLC.

          Pursuant to stipulation and good cause having been shown, the deadline for the Defendant's responsive pleading is extended to June 5, 2015.


         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Prime Healthcare Services-Shasta, LLC v. Burwell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 15, 2015
2:15-CV-00473-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Prime Healthcare Services-Shasta, LLC v. Burwell

Case Details

Full title:PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

2:15-CV-00473-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2015)