From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PRIM ADVISORS, INC. v. LAETTNER

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 26, 2007
CASE NO.: 1:07CV1720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:07CV1720.

November 26, 2007


ORDER (Resolving Doc. #9)


This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment against Christian D. Laettner and Brian Davis by Confession. (Doc. #9) Under Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375 (1994), the Supreme Court determined that a district court could retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement by either: (1) expressly including a provision retaining jurisdiction in the order of dismissal; or (2) by incorporating the terms of the settlement agreement in the dismissal order. Neither occurred in this case. Here, Plaintiff filed a Rule 41 dismissal with prejudice against the Defendants and did not include language preserving this Court's jurisdiction. (Doc. #7) This Court marginally accepted the dismissal and dismissed the action. (Doc. #8) Therefore, this Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED.

So ordered.


Summaries of

PRIM ADVISORS, INC. v. LAETTNER

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 26, 2007
CASE NO.: 1:07CV1720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 26, 2007)
Case details for

PRIM ADVISORS, INC. v. LAETTNER

Case Details

Full title:PRIM ADVISORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN D. LAETTNER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:07CV1720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 26, 2007)