From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 1994
661 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-04353.

December 28, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; M. William Graybill, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kimberly D. Nolen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The defendant, Herman Dejong Priest, appeals his judgment and sentence for robbery with a weapon. We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in imposing costs without notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we strike the $2 discretionary costs imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993). See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (discretionary costs "cannot be imposed unless a defendant is given notice and an opportunity to be heard, and the record recites the statutory authority for their imposition").

§ 812.13(1) and (2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993).

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Priest v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 28, 1994
661 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Priest v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN DEJONG PRIEST, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 28, 1994

Citations

661 So. 2d 29 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Scott v. State

We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in imposing a cost of $2.00 pursuant to…

Drakes v. State

We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in imposing a cost of $2.00 pursuant to…