From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prida v. Communication Contractors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 1, 1995
658 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-1496.

May 1, 1995.

An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims John G. Tomlinson, Jr.

Richard J. Dolan II of the Law Offices of David A. Snyder, Miami, for appellant.

Kimberly A. Hill of Conroy, Simberg Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for appellees.


We affirm without discussion appellant's Issues I, II and III, but reverse Issue IV and remand with directions to the judge of compensation claims to award wage-loss benefits, pursuant to our opinion in Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz, 658 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Although Prida filed numerous job-search forms, the carrier admitted that it had not informed Prida of his obligation to perform a work search, and there was no evidence showing who, if anyone, did inform him.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prida v. Communication Contractors

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 1, 1995
658 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Prida v. Communication Contractors

Case Details

Full title:HERMES PRIDA, APPELLANT, v. COMMUNICATION CONTRACTORS AND EXECUTIVE RISK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 1, 1995

Citations

658 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)