From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2014
Case No. 1:12-cv-360 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-360

03-04-2014

LANDON M. PRICE, Plaintiff v. RICHARD K. JONES, SHERIFF, et al., Defendants.


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of his constitutional rights.

On February 24, 2014, a Court order mailed to plaintiff was subsequently returned to the Clerk by the United States Postal Service as "Undeliverable." (Doc. 47, docket entry of February 24, 2014). Plaintiff was previously notified by the Court's Order of May 21, 2012, that he must inform the Court promptly of any changes of address which occur during the pendency of this lawsuit. (Doc. 4).

On February 25, 2014, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days why this Court should not dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. (Doc. 48). The February 15, 2014 Order, which was sent by certified mail to plaintiff, was returned by the United States Postal Service as "undeliverable." (Doc. 50). A review of the Boone County Jail website indicates that plaintiff no longer resides at that facility. See http://www.boonecountyky .org/jl/InmateStatus (last visited on March 4, 2014). As of this date, plaintiff has failed to advise the Court of his current address.

Failure of a party to obey an Order of the Court warrants invocation of the Court's inherent power to sua sponte dismiss civil actions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). District courts have this power to dismiss civil actions for want of prosecution to "manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases." Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626,630-631 (1962). See also Jour dan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109 (6th Cir. 1991). By failing to keep the Court apprised of his current address, plaintiff demonstrates a lack of prosecution of his action and a failure to obey a Court order. Accordingly, dismissal is appropriate.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Court Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

__________

Karen L. Litkovitz, Magistrate Judge

United States District Court
LANDON M. PRICE, Plaintiff

vs RICHARD K. JONES, SHERIFF, et al. Defendants

Case No. 1:12-cv-360


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTIOM

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY I

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.

¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.

¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits.

A. Signature

× [v]Agent

[ ] Addressee

B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery

1. Article Addressed to:

D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ? [ ] Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [ ] No

3. Sen/ice Type

[v] Certified Mail [ ] Express Mail

[ ] Registered [ ] Return Receipt for Merchandise

[ ] Insured Mail [ ] C.O.D.

4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [ ] Yes

2. Article Number 7002 3150 0000 8389 9876

(Transfer from service label)


PS Form 3811, February 2004

Domestic Return Receipt

102595-02-M-1540


Summaries of

Price v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2014
Case No. 1:12-cv-360 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Price v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:LANDON M. PRICE, Plaintiff v. RICHARD K. JONES, SHERIFF, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-360 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2014)