From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Apr 6, 2020
Case No. 6:19-CV-16-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 6:19-CV-16-JDK-KNM

04-06-2020

ERIC RAY PRICE, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Eric Ray Price, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 18, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 8), recommending that Plaintiff's action be dismissed under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Id. at 2-3. Plaintiff filed objections on July 22, 2019. Docket No. 9.

The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections. Plaintiff argues that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury because the "prison unit violated the water code" and because of physical threats. Id. at 1. However, "[n]ew claims and issues may not . . . be raised for the first time in objections to a Report and Recommendation." Andrews v. United States, No. 4:16-CV-846, 2019 WL 913873, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2019). Plaintiff's complaint only mentions conduct that occurred in the past; namely, a "fan fell off of a trash can on [plaintiff's] feet because neither [were] secured." Docket No. 1 at 4. Because Plaintiff does not show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, his claims are dismissed.

Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff to the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Plaintiff's objections are without merit. The Court therefore adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 8) be ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the refiling of another in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice as to the refiling of the lawsuit without seeking in forma pauperis status and upon payment of the full $400.00 filing fee. Should Plaintiff pay the full filing fee in this lawsuit within fifteen days of the date of entry of this order, he shall be allowed to proceed in this lawsuit as though the full filing fee had been paid from the outset.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of April, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Price v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Apr 6, 2020
Case No. 6:19-CV-16-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Price v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:ERIC RAY PRICE, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Apr 6, 2020

Citations

Case No. 6:19-CV-16-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2020)