From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Bone

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 20, 1983
305 S.E.2d 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

66245.

DECIDED MAY 20, 1983.

Action for damages. Newton Superior Court. Before Judge Ellis.

Daniel C. B. Levy, for appellant.

I. J. Parkerson, for appellees.


The plaintiff was injured when the automobile in which he was a passenger collided with a light pole. The complaint, as originally filed, sought recovery for negligence only against the driver, Gregory Bone. In an amendment to the complaint, James Bone, the father of Gregory Bone, was added as a defendant, with his liability being predicated upon the family purpose doctrine. By affidavit, both father and son testified that the son had purchased the vehicle with his own money and that he had exclusive custody and control of it. A copy of the certificate of title showing Gregory Bone as the owner accompanies his affidavit. This appeal is from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the father. Held:

"The rules applicable to the family purpose doctrine are as follows: `To come within the application of the doctrine, the defendant must own the automobile, or at least have some recognized property interest in it or supply it, and he must have made it available for family use rather than for use in his business...' Prosser, Law of Torts (2d Ed.), p. 370 § 66." Finnocchio v. Lunsford, 129 Ga. App. 694 (2) ( 201 S.E.2d 1) (1973). "Nevertheless, the `principal factor "is authority and control of the vehicle, and this is not necessarily determined by title to the vehicle or payment for the expenses of operation." [Cit.] "Agency, not ownership, is the test of liability." [Cits.]'" Dillard v. Clements, 144 Ga. App. 512 ( 241 S.E.2d 838) (1978).

Plaintiff urges that a fact issue is created by evidence that Gregory Bone told an insurance adjuster that the car was registered in his father's name. This evidence does not provide a basis for recovery against the father in view of the affidavits and the certificate of title establishing that Gregory Bone was the exclusive owner of the vehicle. See South v. Martin, 147 Ga. App. 198 ( 248 S.E.2d 230) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 20, 1983.


Summaries of

Price v. Bone

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 20, 1983
305 S.E.2d 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Price v. Bone

Case Details

Full title:PRICE v. BONE et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 20, 1983

Citations

305 S.E.2d 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
305 S.E.2d 451

Citing Cases

Pague v. Pendley

Since none of these criteria were met here, summary judgment was also proper on this ground. Price v. Bone,…

Lipe v. Coomler

Charles Coomler had no property interest in the vehicle, nor did he restrict Bryan's use of it. At the time…