From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prevost v. Dunham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
4:12-cv-00529-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

4:12-cv-00529-KGB-JJV

12-13-2012

JOHN EDWARD PREVOST, II ADC #144749 PLAINTIFF v. KENNY DUNHAM, Assistant Jail Administrator, Van Buren County Jail DEFENDANT


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. The Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 day of December, 2012.

_______________

KRISTINE G. BAKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Prevost v. Dunham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
4:12-cv-00529-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Prevost v. Dunham

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD PREVOST, II ADC #144749 PLAINTIFF v. KENNY DUNHAM, Assistant…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

4:12-cv-00529-KGB-JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 13, 2012)