From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prevedello v. Fitter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
CV 15-0776-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)

Opinion

          Christopher Prevedello, Plaintiff, Pro se, Chowchilla, CA.


          PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

          Honorable John E. McDermott, United States Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 16, 2015, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend within thirty days. Plaintiff was explicitly cautioned that failure to file a First Amended Complaint (" FAC") by the deadline set forth in the Court's Order of June 16, 2015, could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order.

         The July 17, 2015, deadline to file the FAC has passed, and no FAC has been filed.

         In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a Court order. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than August 13, 2015. Plaintiff's failure to respond in writing to the Order to Show Cause by the deadline may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will not be heard unless ordered by the Court. Upon the filing of a Response, the Order to Show Cause will stand submitted.

         Filing of a First Amended Complaint consistent with the requirements of the Court's Order of June 16, 2015, shall be a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

         No extensions of this deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Prevedello v. Fitter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
CV 15-0776-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Prevedello v. Fitter

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER PREVEDELLO v. J. FITTER, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2015

Citations

CV 15-0776-GHK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)