Pressley v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Miller v. State

    996 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    Because Appellant's sentence for grand theft has expired, his case is hereby dismissed as moot. See Pressley v. State, 741 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that a claim raised pursuant to rule 3.800(a) may be moot once the movant has completed his sentence). DISMISSED.

  2. Atwood v. State

    765 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 10 times
    Reversing summary denial of rule 3.800 motion alleging improper scoring of prior record for review of entire court record to determine if error could be resolved from the record

    Accordingly, the trial court reversibly erred in summarily denying the motion without attaching portions of the record in support of its ruling. See Pressley v. State, 741 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Speer v. State, 734 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Corp, 698 So.2d at 1349. The trial court is instructed to determine on remand whether the appellant's motion can be resolved on such a record.