From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Preslicka v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 26, 2009
Civil No. 07-4237 (PAM/JJK) (D. Minn. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-4237 (PAM/JJK).

February 26, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated January 8, 2009. The R R recommended that this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in part, deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with the R R.

The Government has no objections to the R R. The Court therefore ADOPTS the R R (Docket No. 20).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 18) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED in part; and
3. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the R R, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Preslicka v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 26, 2009
Civil No. 07-4237 (PAM/JJK) (D. Minn. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Preslicka v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Steve A. Preslicka, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 07-4237 (PAM/JJK) (D. Minn. Feb. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Franks v. Colvin

However, drug dependence due to legitimately prescribed medications is likely insufficient to discount a…