From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Aug 6, 2009
08cv335-IEG-NLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2009)

Opinion


PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., Defendant. No. 08cv335-IEG-NLS No. 185. United States District Court, S.D. California. August 6, 2009

          ORDER DENYING ATC'S ARGUMENT REGARDING PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ADMITTED AND UNCONTESTED FACTS

          IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief District Judge.

         At the Pretrial Conference, a week after the parties lodged their Proposed Pretrial Order, defendant American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC") submitted under seal an "Argument Regarding Proposed Additional Admitted and Uncontested Facts." (Doc. No. 185.) Presidio submitted an opposition on June 15, 2009. On June 1, 2009, the Court signed and entered the Pretrial Order. As such, ATC's argument is DENIED AS MOOT.

         Furthermore, the Court directs the parties to meet and confer regarding any additional admitted and uncontested facts. No later than two weeks prior to trial, the parties shall submit any additional stipulations as appropriate.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Aug 6, 2009
08cv335-IEG-NLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Aug 6, 2009

Citations

08cv335-IEG-NLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2009)